Disposed
Ashok Kumars/O. Late Sh. Harish Chandra Jain v. Insurance Rgulatory and Developmentauthority(Irda) and 9 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/97/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29-PIL-97-2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.97 OF 2013
Ashok Kumar s/o. Late Sh. Harish Chandra Jain ...Petitioner
vs. Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority and Others ...Respondents
Mr. P.S. Sarkar, for the Petitioner.
Mr. B.M. Chatterji, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Ranit Basu, for Respondent No. 1.
Ms. Kavita Solanke, AGP for Respondent No. 2.
Mr. N.R. Prajapati a/w. Mr. Chunawala, for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Birendra Saraf and Ms. Sanaya Dadachanji i/b. M/s. Manilal K. Ambalal & Co., for Respondent No. 7.
Mr. Chetan Kapadia a/w. Ms. Manik Joshi i/b. M/s. Chitnis & Co., for Respondent No. 8.
Mr. Ashish Kamath a/w. Mr. Yuvraj Singh i/b. Desai & Diwanji, for Respondent No. 9.
Mr. Ravi Suryawanshi and Ms. Mansi Nair i/b. Naik & Co., for Respondent No. 10.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 11, 2017
P.C.:
. In view of the relief claimed in the Petition, it appears to be a Public Interest Litigation in the nature of Criminal proceeding. In the circumstances, learned counsel for the Petitioner is directed to amend the Petition so as to make it Criminal Public Interest Litigation. Amendment to be carried out within one month.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
Ashok Kumar
Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court