The court disposed of Writ Petition No. 279 of 2017 by clarifying that there is no communication by the Deputy Registrar and directing the Additional Collector to decide objections to the provisional list on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YBG
1
prod28101wp27917
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.279 OF 2017
Raosaheb Narayan Shind .. Petitioner - Versus - State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Girish Godbole with Drupad Patil and Akshay Petkar and Sumit Kothari for petitioners
Mr. A.Y.Sakhare, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.G.Vagyani, GP with Ms. N.M.Mehra, AGP for State Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH DEU NAIK JJ. DATE : 11th January 2017.
P.C.
1] For the reasons stated in the order dated 11th January 2017 passed in Writ Petition No.277 of 2017, this petition is disposed of. However, with a clarification that in this matter, there is no such communication by the Deputy Registrar and in the circumstances, the Additional Collector shall decide the objections to the provisional list on its own merits and in accordance with law. All contentions of both sides are kept open.
(PRAKASH DEU NAIK, J)
(SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J)
Raosaheb Narayan Shind
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash Deu Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
