Petitioners' writ petition was disposed of on the ground that by efflux of time, the petition had become infructuous, resulting in the discharge of the rule.
Petition disposed; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 6-WP448-94.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.448 OF 1994
The Vaidyanath Urban Co-operative
Bank Limited, Parli-Vaijnath,
through its General Managar -
R.T.Kore
and anr.
..Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra,
Through G.P., High Court,
Bench at Aurangabad
and anr.
..Respondents
Mr.R.S.Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioners
Mr.A.B.Girase, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2
CORAM : V.M. KANADE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 12, 2017
PER COURT :
Heard.
2.The learned Counsel for the petitioners
submits that by efflux of time, the petition has
become infructuous.
2 6-WP448-94.odt
3.The petition accordingly stands disposed
of since it has become infructuous. Rule
discharged.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [V.M. KANADE, J.]
kbp
The Vaidyanath Urban Co-operative Bank Limited through its General Manager R.T.Kore and anr.
The State of Maharashtra Through G.P., High Court, Bench at Aurangabad and anr.
V.M. KANADE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court