The Advocates Bar Association of Maharashtra State Wakf Tribunal Aurangabad through Its President v. Union Government of India through Its Chief Secretary New Delhi and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil156.16
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 156 OF 2016
THE ADVOCATES BAR ASSOCIATION OF MAHARASHTRA STATE WAKF TRIBUNAL AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT VERSUS
UNION GOVERNMENT OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARYNEW DELHI AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Javed Abdul H. Deshmukh Assistant Solicitor General for R. Nos.1 and 2: Mr. S.B. Deshpande Government Pleader for Respondents 3 and 4: Mr. A. B. Girase
CORAM : V. M. KANADE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 19th JANUARY, 2017
P.C. :-
rlj/
Advocates Bar Association of Maharashtra State Wakf Tribunal Aurangabad Through Its President
Union Government of India Through Its Chief Secretary New Delhi
V. M. Kanade
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court