This Public Interest Litigation was automatically dismissed for non-compliance with the court's directions regarding the deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs. The court held that nothing survived for consideration despite the grant of an extension of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-PIL.141.2016
1/1
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.141 OF 2016
Pandurang Sakharam Morde ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Vijaykumar Bhima Dighe for the Petitioner.
Mr.P.G.Sawant, A.G.P for the Respondent-State.
Mr.U.B.Nighot for Respondent Nos.6 to 8.
CORAM : DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. & M. S. SONAK, J.
DATE : 22nd NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C. :
. In terms of our directions and orders, Public Interest Litigation
is automatically dismissed for non-compliance of deposit of Rs.15 lakhs, in
spite of extension of time. Accordingly, nothing survives for consideration.
M. S. SONAK, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Pandurang Sakharam Morde
The State of Maharashtra
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
