Dismissed

Sajeev Singh Manjit Singh Obhan and Anr. v. Arvind Laxmidas Joysar and 4 Ors.

Bombay HC5 May 2017NMS/79/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a civil suit and notices of motion based on consent terms signed by the parties. Defendants 2-5 were deleted, a new Defendant 2 was added, and the suit was concluded per agreed terms.

What did the court decide?

The Suit is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. Notices of Motion Nos.1869 of 2015 and 79 of 2016 also disposed of. Liberty to apply.

Sajeev Singh Manjit Singh Obhan and Anr. Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

S 967 OF 2015 (911).sxw

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

SUIT NO.967 OF 2015
WITH

¶4

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1869 OF 2015
AND

¶5

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.79 OF 2016

¶6

Sanjeev Singh Manjit Singh Obhan and Anr. …Plaintiffs

¶7

versus

¶8

Arvind Laxmidas Joysar and Ors.

¶9

…Defendants

¶10

Mr. Z. Jariwala i/by M/s. Thakore Jariwala Associates, for Plaintiffs.
Mr. V.T.Dubey, for Defendant No.1.

¶11

CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.

¶12

DATE: 5th MAY, 2017

¶13

P.C.:

¶14

1.By consent, the names of Defendant Nos.2 to 5 be deleted as party
Defendants to the above Suit.

¶15

2.By consent, the following person be added as Defendant No.2 to the

¶16

above Suit :

¶17

Jeevan Dugappa Shetty of Mumbai
Indian Inhabitant, aged 48 years,
Residing at 39, Mount View S.T.Road,
Behind Central Bank, Mankhurd,
Mumbai - 400 088.

¶18

3.Amendment to be carried out on or before 6th May, 2017. Re-

¶19

verification is dispensed with.

¶20

1/2

¶21

ssp

¶22

S 967 OF 2015 (911).sxw

¶23

4.The learned Advocates for the Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.1 and 2
have now tendered Consent Terms dated 5th May, 2017. They submit that the
Consent Terms be taken on record and the above Suit be disposed of in terms of the
Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for
identification. The Consent Terms are signed by Plaintiff No.2 for self and as
constituted attorney of Plaintiff No.1, Defendant No.1 and the newly added
Defendant No.2. The learned Advocates for the parties have also signed the Consent
Terms. The undertakings recorded in the Consent Terms are accepted. The Suit is
disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms, marked 'X'. Refund of Court Fees, if any,
as per rules. Notices of Motion Nos.1869 of 2015 and 79 of 2016 also stands disposed
of. Liberty to apply. The Court Receiver and the Prothonotary and Senior Master to
act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate of this Court.

¶24

( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )

¶25

2/2

¶26

ssp

Sajeev Singh Manjit Singh Obhan and Anr. v. Arvind Laxmidas Joysar and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajeev Singh Manjit Singh Obhan and Anr. v. Arvind Laxmidas Joysar and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Vishnu Tirodkar Vs M/S. Navkar Group Private Limited and 6 Ors.

The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. Vs Mv Chandi Prasad (Imo No. 8804098) and Anr.

Sarla Suresh Rajani Vs Akshaara G. Rajani

Sajeev Singh Manjit Singh Obhan and Anr. Vs Arvind Laxmidas Joysar and Another

Sajeev Singh Manjit Singh Obhan and Anr. Vs Arvind Laxmidas Joysar and 5 Ors.

Pratibha Industries Limited Vs M/S. Jesica Construction and 2 Ors.