Disposed
Vijay Vishnu Tirodkar v. M/S. Navkar Group Private Limited and 6 Ors.
Bombay HCCOMS/270/2017
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
comsl 99 of 2017 (915).sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
SUIT (L) NO.99 OF 2017 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.92 OF 2017
Vijay Vishnu Tirodkar …Plaintiff
versus
M/s. Navkar Group Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. …Defendants
M/s. M.V.Kini and Co., for Plaintiff.
Mr. Atul G. Damle, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. Ashish J. Dubey, for Defendant Nos.1 to
3.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 5th MAY, 2017
P.C.:
1.The learned Advocate for the Defendants undertakes to file
Vakalatnama on or before 6th May, 2017. The undertaking is accepted.
2.The learned Advocates appearing for the parties have tendered
Consent Terms dated 5th May, 2017. They submit that the Consent Terms be taken
on record and the above Suit as well as Notice of Motion be disposed of in terms of the
Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for
identification. The Consent Terms are signed by the Plaintiff, Defendant No.2 for
self and as Director of Defendant No.1, Defendant No.3 and the learned Advocates for
the parties. The undertakings recorded in the Consent Terms are accepted. The Suit
1/2
ssp
comsl 99 of 2017 (915).sxw
as well as Notice of Motion are disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms, marked
'X'. Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per rules.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
2/2
ssp
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court