Single judge disposed miscellaneous civil application seeking fresh notices to specific respondents as they were already shown served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 411 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 123 OF 2014
SMT. RUKMINIBAI KRISHNARAO RANE SARDESSAI AND 30 ORS., Versus SHRI GAUTAM RAMANBAI PATEL AND 13 ORS.,
... Applicants
... Respondents
Adv. S. Munj for the applicants. Adv. R. Kantak for Respondent no.3.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:17th January, 2017
P.C.:
This application was only for sending fresh notices to the respondent nos.13 and 14 on the correct addresses. The Respondent nos.13 and 14 are shown to be served. Thus, nothing survives in the application which is disposed of.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
ap/-
Respondent no.3
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
