This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 521 OF 2012
SHRI NARANA POROBO MAMBRO SINCE DEC. THROUGH ITS LR'S Versus SHRI VINAECA ALIAS VASSANTA N. SINAI RATABOLI SINCE DEC. THROUGH LR'S
... Petitioner
... Respondents
Mr. C. A. Coutinho, Advocate for respondent nos.1(i) to (vi).
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:16th January, 2017
P.C.
Since 18/11/2016, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioners. On 22/12/2016, after noticing the absence, the petition was fixed for dismissal. Today again, none appears for the petitioners. Consequently, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, with no order as to costs.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
SMA
SHRI NARANA POROBO MAMBRO SINCE DEC THROUGH ITS LR'S
SHRI VINAECA ALIAS VASSANTA N. SINAI RATABOLI SINCE DEC THROUGH LR'S
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
