Sangita Ashok Salunke Alias Sangita Subhash Abhang v. Anusaya Sakharam Abhang and Anr.
Bombay HCLPETN/96/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
905-LPETN-96-2017.DOC
¶2
Jsn
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION LEAVE PETITION NO. 96 OF 2017
¶4
IN
¶5
SUIT (L) NO. 1086 OF 2016
¶6
Sangita Ashok Salunke alias Sangita Subhash …Petitioner
Abhang
Versus
Anusaya Sakharam Abhang & Anr…Respondents
¶7
Mr Sachin J Kadam, for the Petitioner.
¶8
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:9th March 2017
¶9
PC:-
¶10
1.The Petitioner proposes to file a partition Suit. The
Respondents/Defendants reside outside Mumbai. A material part of
the cause of action has arisen in Mumbai where some of the
properties are located. I am satisfied that with leave granted, this
Court would have the jurisdiction to entertain the Suit.
¶11
2. Leave granted. The Petition is made absolute.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sangita Ashok Salunke alias Sangita Subhash Abhang
- respondent
Anusaya Sakharam Abhang & Anr
Coram
AI extract
G. S. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court