This single-line order decrees suit prayers (a), (b), and (d) with no intent on damages. It directs destruction of seized goods, discharge of the Court Receiver, and instructs parties to comply.
Suit decreed in terms of prayers (a), (b), and (d). Seized goods to be repackaged and destroyed by Defendant within 12 weeks at their cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-S-131-2017.DOC
JSN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 131 OF 2017
Hindustan Unilever Limited…Plaintiffs
Versus
Chandni Soap Works…Defendant
Mr. Ashutosh Kane, with Anusha Ramanathan, i/b W.S. Kane &
Co., for the Plaintiffs.
Mr. Manish Hiranand Lund, Proprietor of the Defendant present.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 8th March 2017
PC:-
1. The Leave Petition was allowed on 2nd March 2017.
2.Mr. Manish Hiranand Lund, Proprietor of the Defendant,
who is personally present in Court, submits to a decree in terms of
prayer clauses (a), (b) and (d) of the Suit. Mr. Kane, therefore, does
not press the prayer for damages.
3.The Suit is decreed in these terms with no order as to costs.
Drawn up decree is dispensed with. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in
accordance with the Rules.
Page 1 of 2
8th March 2017
904-S-131-2017.DOC
4.The Court Receiver had sealed certain goods. These are to be
destroyed after removing the goods from the impugned packaging by
the Defendants at their cost within a period of 12 weeks. The
Defendant will file an Affidavit of compliance within a period of
sixteen weeks from today. The Defendant may reuse the goods.
5.The Court Receiver stands discharged without passing
accounts but on payment of his costs, charges and expenses within
four weeks from today by the Plaintiffs.
6. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
8th March 2017
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court