Disposed

The Maharashtra Krushna Vally Development Corporation Throuh Its Exe Eng Med Project Divn Osmanaba v. Kanik Kondiba Khade and Anr.

Bombay HC13 Dec 2017FA/4989/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the pending appeals where parties reached a compromise via Lok Adalat in related matters. The appellant deposited compensation, accepted as full and final, which was ordered transferred to the Reference Court with interest for disbursement among claimants.

What did the court decide?

Appellant to transfer deposited compensation + interest to Reference Court for disbursement; pending applications disposed of.

The Maharashtra Krushna Vally Development Corporation Throuh Its Exe Eng Med Project Divn Osmanaba Vs Kanik Kondiba Khade and Anr. — Bombay HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

915.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

915 FIRST APPEAL NO. 4989 OF 2017

¶4

WITH CA/10764/2016 IN FA/4989/2017 WITH FA/4990/2017
WITH CA/10766/2016 IN FA/4990/2017

¶5

THE MAHARASHTRA KRUSHNA VALLY DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATIONTHROUH ITS EXE ENG MED PRO
VERSUS

¶6

KANIK KONDIBA KHADE AND ANR

¶7

...

¶8

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Gaikwad Anil M.
Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. C. K. Shinde.

¶9

ORDER:

¶10

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the

¶11

appellant and learned counsel appearing for respondent/
original claimant. Both counsel appearing for the
parties submit that there were total 29 appeals arising

¶12

out of the same judgment and Award of the Reference
Court out of which 19 appeals were disposed in Lok-
Adalat, dated 09.09.2017. 08 appeals were disposed of
by this Court (Coram : Prakash D. Naik, J.) in terms of
compromise took place between the parties in Lok-Adalat

¶13

and now only two appeals are pending from the above set
of appeals. The order passed in Lok-Adalat as well as

¶14

by this Court on 21.11.2017 are placed on record. Those

¶15

are taken on record and marked as Exh. 'X' for the
purpose of identification.

¶16

1/2

¶17

915.odt

¶18

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that
in view of the compromise took place before the Lok-
Adalat in other matters the appellant has deposited the
amount of compensation including the amount of
compensation in the present two appeals. Mr. Shinde,
learned counsel for the original claimant on
instructions submits that, the amount of compensation
deposited by the appellant in present appeals is
acceptable to claimants as a full and final. They have
not preferred cross objection in the matter.

¶19

3. In view of the above, the appeals are disposed
of in above terms.

¶20

4. Amount deposited by the appellant in this Court
be transferred to the Reference Court along with
interest if any for its disbursement amongst the
claimants.

¶21

5. Pending Civil Applications are disposed of.

¶22

mkd

¶23

2/2

The Maharashtra Krushna Vally Development Corporation Throuh Its Exe Eng Med Project Divn Osmanaba v. Kanik Kondiba Khade and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Maharashtra Krushna Vally Development Corporation Throuh Its Exe Eng Med Project Divn Osmanaba v. Kanik Kondiba Khade and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Gangadhar Digamber Tigile Vs Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Thr Divisional Officer, Latur and Anr.

The State of Maharashtra Vs Narsing Gopal Pawar and Another

Balkishan Pusaram Partani and Ors. Vs the Executive Engineer, Majalgaon Canal Division NO.10, Parbhani and Ors.

Malanbai Kisan Kajave Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S National Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Asst. Manager, Mr. Dhirendrakumar B. Mishra Vs Prema Sampat Rokade and Ors.

Sandhya Kishor Mahajan and Anr. Vs Saudarabai Megharaj Pawar and Ors.