Dismissed

Gangadhar Digamber Tigile v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Thr Divisional Officer, Latur and Anr.

Bombay HC12 Dec 2017CA/4620/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Aurangabad dismissed an application filed by an applicant seeking withdrawal of compensation deposited by the acquiring body, as the Civil Court had already restrained withdrawal pending adjudication of shares.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed; liberty granted to file fresh application after adjudication of shares.

Gangadhar Digamber Tigile Vs Maharashtra Industrial… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

ca4620.17

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4620 OF 2017

¶5

IN

¶6

FA/3115/2017

¶7

WITH
CA/2282/2017

¶8

GANGADHAR DIGAMBER TIGILE

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THR
DIVISIONAL OFFICER, LATUR AND

¶11

...

¶12

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Gundre Suraj V.
AGP for Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr. S.S.Dande
.....

¶13

CORAM: K.L.WADANE, J.
DATED: 12th December, 2017

¶14

O R D E R :

¶15

Heard learned counsel for both sides.

¶16

2.This is an application for withdrawal of

¶17

amount of compensation deposited by the acquiring
body in this Court.

¶18

3.Learned counsel appearing for the

¶19

respondent points out that the present applicant

¶20

is restrained by the Civil Court from withdrawing

¶21

the amount of compensation granted in L.A.R. Nos.
120 of 1999, 584 of 1999 and 71 of 1999 as per
order passed below Exh.5 dated 8.11.2017.

¶22

2ca4620.17

¶23

4.Since the Civil Court has restrained the
present applicant from withdrawing the amount of
compensation,thisapplicationcannotbe
entertained. Accordingly, it is dismissed.
Liberty is granted to file such application after
adjudication of the respective shares.

¶24

 (K.L.WADANE, J.)

¶25

dbm

Gangadhar Digamber Tigile v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Thr Divisional Officer, Latur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gangadhar Digamber Tigile v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Thr Divisional Officer, Latur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baburao Dattarao Bhalerao and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through Collector, Hingoli and Others

Bhausaheb Bapusaheb Mhasrup and Anr. Vs the Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition JP-1, Officer/Collector, Aurangabad and Anr.

Special Land Acquisition Officer, Laghu Patbandhare Vibhag, Jalgaon and Another Vs Shantram Namdeo Patil Died Thr His Lrs Motanbai and Others

The State of Maharashtra Vs Narsing Gopal Pawar and Another

Balkishan Pusaram Partani and Ors. Vs the Executive Engineer, Majalgaon Canal Division NO.10, Parbhani and Ors.

M/S Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Manager (Legal) Vs Ranjana Kashinath Gadekar and Ors.