This appeal was disposed of because the tax effect was less than Rs. 20,00,000/-, rendering the appeal unsustainable per a Central Government Circular. The pending Civil Application was also disposed of.
The appeal and pending Civil Application are disposed of as unsustainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) WP No .1147/2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1147 OF 2006
Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs Town Centre, N-5, CIDCO, Aurangabad
.. Appellant .
Versus
M/s Bajaj Auto Ltd., M.I.D.C. Area, Waluj, Aurangabad
.. Respondent .
Mr. D.S. Ladda, Advocate for the appellant.
Mrs. Charuta S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
Dated : 24.08.2017.
ORAL ORDER :-
out that the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs. 20,00,000/-
(Rupees Twenty Lakh) and as per the Circular issued by the Central Government, this appeal cannot be maintained.
(2) WP No .1147/2006
not dispute this position.
Application, if any, stands disposed of. No order as to costs.
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL ) ( R.D. DHANUKA ) JUDGE JUDGE
vdd/-
Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs
M/s Bajaj Auto Ltd.
R.D. DHANUKA
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
