Union of India v. Ramakant Ramdas Bagul and 3 Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5.EXAL.1283.16
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO. 1283 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Prothonotary’s orders
Mr. S. R. Rajguru for Applicant.
Ms. Bhagyalaxmi Racha for Respondent Nos. 2 & 4.
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 16, 2017
P.C.:
. Heard learned Counsel for parties.
- The learned Counsel Ms. Racha
submits that she received instructions to appear on behalf of JudgmentDebtors. She requires four weeks time to file her Vakalatnama as well as objection, if any, with copy to other side.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Yadav VG
- respondent
Judgment-Debtors
Coram
K. K. Tated
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court