Union of India v. Ramakant Ramdas Bagul and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjunct order directing applicants to remove office objections on applications under O.S. Rule 986; fails to get, applications to be rejected. No substantive legal proposition.
What the court decided
7 Before: Shri D. V. Sawant. Prothonotary & Senior Master Date: 28th September, 2016
- 61 EXAL/1283/2016 ) None present )
) P.C. : The Applicants and / or their Advocates to remove ) office objections on the Application and get the ) same numbered and registered on or before 19.10.2016, failing the Application to stand ) rejected under O.S. Rule 986.
- 64 EXAL/1294/2016 ) ARB PRO OF 2011 ) WITH ) CHS/1359/2016 ) EXAL/1294/2016 ) ARB PRO OF 2011 ) )
None present
The Applicants and / or their Advocates to remove office objections on the Application and get the same numbered and registered within two weeks after disposal of Chamber Summons, failing the Application to stand rejected under O.S. Rule 986.
- 65 EXAL/1295/2016 ) ARB PROC NO. ) RCS/209/2015 ) )
- 66 EXAL/1296/2016 ) ARB PROC NO. ) RCS/208/2015 ) )
None present
The Applicants and / or their Advocates to remove office objections on the Application and get the same numbered and registered on or before 19.10.2016, failing the Application to stand rejected under O.S. Rule 986.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court