In a public interest litigation filed under criminal appeal jurisdiction, the sole issue was the withdrawal of the petition by the constituted attorney. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the matter without costs.
Leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
52 crpill 3-17-cr
Prs 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.3 OF 2017
| Shilpa Sud | … Public Interest Litigant |
|---|---|
| V/s. | |
| The State of Maharashtra and anr. | … Respondents |
| and | |
| Arvind Premchand Jain and ors. | … Proposed Respondents |
Mr. Goldie Sud, Constituted Attorney of the Public Interest Litigant present in person. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : V.M.KANADE AND
P.R.BORA, JJ.
DATE : 8th FEBRUARY, 2017.
P.C. :
(P.R.BORA,J.)
(V.M.KANADE,J.)
Shilpa Sud
The State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
