This bench rejected a contempt petition as devoid of merits, holding that there was no violation of the court's directions and thus no need to take cognizance of the matter.
The contempt petition is rejected for being devoid of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CP 736-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 736 OF 2017
Narayan Dhanaji Rathod
...Petitioner
Versus
The Sate of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents
Mr. S. B. Bhosale, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for the respondent No.1/State
CORAM : R. M. BORDE &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI. JJ. DATE : 13-12-2017
PER COURT :
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [R. M. BORDE] JUDGE JUDGE
vjg/-.
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to take cognizance of a contempt petition in absence of any violation of the court's direction.
Whether the claim of non-violation renders the contempt petition devoid of merits.
Whether the instant contempt petition should be rejected.
Narayan Dhanaji Rathod
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
