The single-judge bench disposed of the writ petition by reserving an option for the petitioner to pursue available legal remedies without deciding the merits of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp862716.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8627 OF 2016
Ganesh s/o Bhaskarrao Patil
Petitioner
Versus
Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon & another
Respondents
Mr.S.R.Barlinge, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.J.S.Aute, advocate holding for Mr.B.S.Mundhe, advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr.S.B.Sontakke, advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ. DATE : 12th December, 2017
PER COURT:
Keeping an option open to the petitioner to avail of the remedies available in law, writ petition stands disposed of.
SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI JUDGE
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
adb/wp862716
Ganesh s/o Bhaskarrao Patil
Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon
another
R.M. Borde
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
