The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad disposed of a civil application, condoning a delay of 66 days in presenting a review petition under Writ Petition No. 9447 of 2017.
Delay of 66 days in filing review application was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA 14234-2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14234 OF 2017 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.35321 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9447 OF 2017
The Union of India and others
...Applicants
Versus
Bharat Baliram Chavaqn and others ...Respondents
Mr. S. B. Deshpande, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for applicants.
Mr. S. D. Tawshikar, Advocate for respondents.
CORAM : R. M. BORDE &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI. JJ. DATE : 13-12-2017
PER COURT :
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [R. M. BORDE] JUDGE JUDGE
vjg/-.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the six-month limitation period for presenting a review application should be summarily rejected.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India and others
Bharat Baliram Chavaqn and others
R. M. Borde
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
