Disposed
Janak Mathuradas and 3 Others v. Union of India and 7 Others
Bombay HCCHOL/542/2017
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
chol 542 of 2017 (923).sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER ORDER NO.542 OF 2017
IN
SUIT NO.50 OF 2017
Janak Mathuradas and Ors.
…Plaintiffs
versus
Union of India and Ors.
…Defendants
Mr. Yogesh Adhia, for Plaintiffs.
Mr. B.B.Sharma, for Defendant Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Dushant Upadhyay i/by M/s. K. Ashar and Co., for Defendant No.3.
Mr. Bhalchandra R. Palav i/by Mr. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, for Defendant No.6.
Mr. Prateek Sakseria with Mr. Nitesh Jain, Mr. S.M.Algaus, Ms. Juhi Mathur, Ms.
Fatema Barodawalla and Mr. Jeet Karia i/by M/s. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas and
Co., for Defendant No.7.
Mr. Cyrus Ardeshir with Mr. Rahul Dwarkadas, Mr. Jaron Diwan i/by M/s. Veritas
Legal, for Defendant No.8.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 2nd MAY, 2017
P.C.:
1.Perused the Chamber Order and the Affidavit in support thereto. For
reasons set out in the Affidavit in support of the Chamber Order, the Chamber Order
is allowed and M/s. Veritas Legal are discharged from appearing for Defendant No.8
in the above Suit. The Chamber Order is accordingly disposed of.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court