Allowed a Chamber Order assigning counsel in Summary Suit No.2392 of 2004 to Mr. Rajani Associates for Defendants Nos.2 and 4, dismissing the appeal by them. No other substantive decision was rendered.
Chamber Order assigning counsel to Defendants Nos.2 and 4 allowed and upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
chol 483 of 2017 (921).sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER ORDER NO.483 OF 2017
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO.2392 OF 2004
Bajaj Hindustan Ltd.
…Plaintiff
versus
Jayantilal Khandwala and Sons Pvt. Ltd.
…Defendant
Mr. Ashish Kamat with Mr. Vedant Desai i/by M/s. Dhru and Co., for Plaintiff.
Ms. Pari Mohan i/by M/s. Vivek Kantawala and Co., for Defendant Nos.1 and 3.
Mr. Rishabh Jaisani i/by M/s. Rajani Associates, for Defendant Nos.2 and 4.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 2nd MAY, 2017
P.C.:
1.Perused the Chamber Order and the Affidavit in support thereto. For
reasons set out in the Affidavit in support of the Chamber Order, the Chamber Order
is allowed and M/s. Rajani Associates are discharged from appearing for Defendant
Nos.2 and 4 in the above Suit. The Chamber Order is accordingly disposed of.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
Jayantilal Khandwala and Sons Pvt. Ltd.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court