Vasudeo Chintamani Bapat and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1/1 569.17-caw.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
| CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 569 IN |
OF | 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| WRIT PETITION NO. 10015 | OF | 2014 |
| Vasudeo Chintamani Bapat and another. V/s. |
... | Petitioner. |
| The State of Maharashtra and others. And |
... | Respondents. |
| Smt.Mangal Kumar Bapat and others. | … | Opponents. |
K.V.Tembe with Dhananjay Mahamuni for the petitioners. P.P.Kakade, AGP for the State. Akshay Shinde for respondent No.5.
CORAM : DR.MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. AND G.S.KULKARNI , J. DATE : 14th March 2017.
P.C. :
Civil application is allowed. Petitioners to carry out amendment within one week and serve amended writ petition to the respondents who shall file reply to the amended writ petition, if any, within two weeks thereafter.
(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) CHIEF JUSTICE
Vasudeo Chintamani Bapat
The State of Maharashtra
Manjula Chellur
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court