The Bombay High Court dismissed a civil application filed by an applicant as no urgency was demonstrated, treating the matter without great urgency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904.caw.1878.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1878 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10663 OF 2014
Tukaram changya Aale ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others ..Respondents
Mr. Kamalakar L. Koli,for the Applicant. Ms. Sushma Bhende, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM :- S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE :- MARCH 17, 2017.
P. C.:
No urgency is made out by the Applicant. The Civil Application is dismissed.
(B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Aswale 1/1
Tukaram changya Aale
State of Maharashtra
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
B.P.COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
