petition, copy of which is enclosed at page 19 of the paper-book onwards, itself discloses that the petitioner was aware that he worked for thirty four years. His qualifying service entitled him to draw pension. The pension, as paid, was not on the correct computation and calculation. That petition proceeds to allege that the petitioner joined the services of this Corporation as a Fitter Attendant on 24 th January, 1975. He knew the age of his superannuation. The petitioner claims that he retired on attaining the age of superannuation. He rendered unblemished service from 24 th January, 1975 to 30 th November, 2009. The petitioner states that he has put in thirty four years of service which is more than the minimum required / qualifying service of twenty years for entitlement of pension, full gratuity, provident fund contribution, commutation of pension and other benefits. The petitioner claims this relief after writing several letters and making several representations and filling several forms. Upon such a petition, which is exhaustive of all the reliefs that the petitioner claims even now, the petitioner was satisfied with an order of this Court copy of which is to be found at page 37 of the paper-book.
