The High Court at Bombay dismissed the civil application seeking restoration of a writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution, as the applicant had no representative to press it.
Application No. 1046 of 2014 was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-caw-1046-2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1046 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2866 OF 2012
Gajanan Vitthal Kamble (Kavishil) ...Applicant vs. The Dy. Director, Maharashtra State & Others ...Respondents
None for the Applicant. Mr. T.S. Ingle, for the Respondent No. 3. Ms. A. Vhatkar, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 09, 2017
P.C.:
. None for the Applicant to press tge Civil Application No. 1046 of 2014 which is an application for restoration of Writ Petition No. 2866 of 2012 which suffered dismissal for want of prosecution.
Since no one is appearing for the Applicant, the Civil Application
No. 1046 of 2014 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(M. S. SONAK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil application for restoration of the writ petition should be allowed when the applicant is absent.
Gajanan Vitthal Kamble (Kavishil)
The Dy. Director, Maharashtra State & Others
SHANTANU S. KEMKAR
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
