Jaywant S Mulik v. Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provindent Fund and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ petition regarding unpaid provident fund dues. The Court held that the claim required adjudication by the Competent Authority under Section 7A(b) of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, directing Respondent No. 1 to consider the claim with a hearing.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner to be heard before Respondent No. 1 considers the claim under Section 7A(b) of the EPF Act, 1952, and decides it expeditiously.