A single-judge high court bench allowed a civil application for the restoration of a Writ Petition that had been previously dismissed for want of prosecution, finding sufficient cause for the counsel's non-appearance.
Restoration of Writ Petition No. 1306 of 2012 to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-caw-1014-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1014 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1306 OF 2012
Satish Ganapatrao Dabhade vs.
Maharashtra Labour Welfare Board and Ors.
...Applicant
...Respondents
Mr. A.R. Fule i/b. Mr. SSP Legal, for the Applicant Ms. A. Vhatkar, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 09, 2017
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant as also learned AGP for the Respondent-State.
Vishal Parekar 1/2
4-caw-1014-2017.doc
order restoration of Writ Petition No. 1306 of 2012 to its original number.
2/2
Vishal Parekar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was sufficient cause for the want of prosecution to justify restoration of the writ petition.
Satish Ganapatrao Dabhade
Maharashtra Labour Welfare Board and Ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
