Allowed

Kishor Tukaram Talale and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC11 Aug 2017CA/9460/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bench allowed a civil application seeking restoration of a Contempt Petition dismissed for non-removal of objections. The 29-day delay in filing was condoned, and the pending contempt petition was restored to its original number.

What did the court decide?

The delay of 29 days was condoned and Contempt Petition (St.) No.28274/2016 was restored to its original number for disposal.

Kishor Tukaram Talale and Another Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

CA 9460/17 in CP (St) 28274/16 in WP 3193/13

¶2

- 1 -

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

CIVILAPPLICATION NO.9460/2017
IN
CONTEMPT PETITION (St.) NO.28274/2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3193/2013

¶6

Kishor Tukaram Talale & another.
...Applicants..

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...

¶9

 .....
Shri Sandip Thorat, Advocate h/f Miss.Surekha Mahajan,
Advocate for applicants.
Smt.Vaishali Patil - Jadhav, AGP for respondent no.1.

¶10

 .....

¶11

CORAM: SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.

¶12

DATE: 11.08.2017

¶13

ORDER :

¶14

1] Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶15

2]This application seeks restoration of Contempt
Petition (St.) No.28274/2016 filed in Writ Petition
No.3193/2013, which suffered dismissal for non-removal of
office objections within time.

¶16

3]For the reasons stated in the civil application,

¶17

CA 9460/17 in CP (St) 28274/16 in WP 3193/13

¶18

delay of 29 days in filing the application is condoned.

¶19

We have also considered the reasons stated for

¶20

restoration of the Contempt Petition. We are satisfied
that there was sufficient cause for non-removal of office

¶21

objections within time.

¶22

4]In the circumstances, we allow the civil

¶23

application, and restore Contempt Petition (St)
No.28274/2016 to its original number, which is filed in
Writ Petition No.3193/2013. The civil application stands
disposed of accordingly.

¶24

ndk/ c118176.doc

Kishor Tukaram Talale and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishor Tukaram Talale and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Javed Shaikh Gulabsahab Rabbani Vs the Union of India and Others

Pratiksha Anilrao Kanhe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shyam Bhujangrao Naik and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sant Gadgebaba Shikshan Sanstha, Kandhar Thr Secretary Vs J.S. Sahariya

Hemlata Gulabrao Darade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shabir Ansari Education Society Patri Trhoguh President Abdul Habib Abdul Kaleque Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others