Contempt petition for non-compliance of an order was disposed of as the alleged respondent submitted that the order was complied with, leaving no survival.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp82.14
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 82 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5773 OF 2012
Sant Gadgebaba Shikshan Sanstha
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
Ashwini Bhide, The Secretary, Department of School Education, M.S., Mumbai & anr.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr S. S. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner; Mr S. B. Yawalkar, A. G. P. for respondents
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : 11th August, 2017
P.C.
Learned A.G.P. submits that the order of which non compliance has been alleged, has been complied with. In the circumstances, we find that nothing survives in this contempt petition. Accordingly, contempt petition is disposed of.
(N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
(SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
amj
Sant Gadgebaba Shikshan Sanstha
Ashwini Bhide
Shantanu S. Kemkar
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
