This oral order directed the Education Officer to consider the petitioner's proposal for appointment as an Assistant Teachers within three months without analyzing the merits of the case.
Respondent No.2 directed to consider the appointment proposal within three months of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP9865.17
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 9865 OF 2017
Hemlata d/o Gulabrao Darade, Age: 41 years, Occu: Service as Assistant Teacher, R/o. Shubash Nagar, Galli No.1, House No. 31, Dhule, Tq. and Dist. Dhule PETITIONER
Versus
Mr V. S. Panpatte, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr A. R. Kale, AGP for respondent No.1
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & N.W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE : 11th August, 2017
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner claims that the proposal submitted by respondent No.4 for approval of her appointment initially as Shikshan Sevak and
WP9865.17
(2)
thereafter as Assistant Teacher, dated 29th August, 2012, has not been considered by respondent No.2 as yet.
Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(N.W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
amj
Hemlata d/o Gulabrao Darade
The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Department of School Education
The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded
Dhule Education Society
Ramchandra Keshav Chitale Madhymik Vidyalaya
Shantanu S. Kemkar
N. W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
