Allowed

Pravin Vaijenath Dhumak v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC11 Aug 2017CA/5468/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Aurangabad condoned a 542-day delay in removing office objections. The court restored the underlying Writ Petition (St.) No.21184/2015, subject to payment of Rs.3,000/- costs to the High Court Bar Association Library.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is restored to its original number subject to payment of Rs.3,000/- costs. Office objections must be removed within three weeks.

Pravin Vaijenath Dhumak Vs the State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

CA 5468/17 in RC 1388/15 in WP (St) 21184/15

¶2

- 1 -

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

CIVILAPPLICATION NO.5468/2017
IN
REJECTED CASE NO.1388/2015
IN
WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.21184/2015

¶6

Pravin Vaijenath Dhumak.

¶7

...Applicant..

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...

¶10

 .....

¶11

Shri N.R. Thorat, Advocate for applicant.
Shri A.R. Kale, AGP for respondent no.1.

¶12

 .....

¶13

CORAM: SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
 N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.

¶14

DATE: 11.08.2017

¶15

ORDER :

¶16

1] Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶17

2]This civil application seeks restoration of Writ
Petition (St.) No.21184/2015, which suffered dismissal
for non-removal of office objections.

¶18

3]For the reasons stated in the civil application,
delay of 542 days is condoned.

¶19

CA 5468/17 in RC 1388/15 in WP (St) 21184/15

¶20

4]Having gone through the reasons for restoration of

¶21

the writ petition, we are satisfied that there was
sufficient cause for non-removal of office objections
within time.

¶22

5]In the circumstances, we restore the Writ Petition
(St.) No.21184/2015 to its original number subject to the
petitioner's paying costs of Rs.3,000/- to the Library of
the High Court Bar Association at Aurangabad Bench. Only
on submitting the deposit receipt, the petition be
restored. Office objections be removed within three
weeks from today.
6]Civil application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶23

 (N.W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

¶24

ndk/ c118178.doc

Pravin Vaijenath Dhumak v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pravin Vaijenath Dhumak v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Javed Shaikh Gulabsahab Rabbani Vs the Union of India and Others

Pratiksha Anilrao Kanhe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shyam Bhujangrao Naik and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sant Gadgebaba Shikshan Sanstha, Kandhar Thr Secretary Vs J.S. Sahariya

Hemlata Gulabrao Darade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shabir Ansari Education Society Patri Trhoguh President Abdul Habib Abdul Kaleque Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others