Dismissed
Dattatraya Krushna Patil and Another v. Subhash Shivram Bhadane and Others
Bombay HCCA/4338/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA 4338-2017
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4338 OF 2017 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 658 OF 2007
DATTATRAYA KRUSHNA PATIL AND ANOTHER ...APPLICANTS VERSUS SUBHASH SHIVRAM BHADANE AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS
Mr Amit A. Mukhedkar, Advocate for Applicants :
Mr S. P. Shah, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr D. S. Manorkar, Advocate, for respondent No.3, Mr Prashant Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2A to 2D
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 20th July, 2017
ORAL ORDER
No urgency is noticed. As such, application is not pressed for the time being.
Hence application stands rejected, with liberty to move afresh, if required.
( N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
pjm
DATTATRAYA KRUSHNA PATIL AND ANOTHER
SUBHASH SHIVRAM BHADANE AND OTHERS
N.W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court