Naimkhan Rashidkhan and Ors. v. Limba Dagdu Rathod Died Lrs Jema and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Oral order disposing of Civil Application No. 1764 of 2016 as rendered infructuous; no substantive grounds provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA 1764-2016
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1764 OF 2016 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 361 of 1995
Naimkhan Rashidkhan and others ...APPLICANTS
VERSUS
Limba Dagdu Rathod (DIED) Through : Legal representatives Jema Limba Chavan and others
...RESPONDENTS
Mr V.S. Bhavthankar, Advocates for respondents No. 2(1) to 2(J)
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 20th July, 2017
ORAL ORDER
This application for final hearing, which in my opinion, in
view of reasons recorded herein, in earlier orders, has rendered in-
fructuous.
As such, this Civil Application is disposed of.
( N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
pjm
Naimkhan Rashidkhan and others
Jema Limba Chavan and others
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court