Allowed

Rameshwar S/O. Shriram Gutte (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Ramnagar Dist. Chandrapur

Bombay HC27 Sept 2017BA/929/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge allowed bail to applicant arrested under NDPS Act Sections 20/22. Court noted quantity was non-commercial and past was clean, imposing surety and reporting conditions.

What did the court decide?

Granted bail on execution of P.B. of Rs. 15,000 with two solvent sureties in the like amount; reporting once monthly.

What the court decided

Rameshwar S/O. Shriram Gutte (in Jail) Vs the State of… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

ba.929.17.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 929 OF 2017

¶5

( Rameshwar S/o Shriram Gutte..vs..The State of Maharashtra, through PSO.PS.Ramnagar,District-Chandrapur)

¶6

_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.

¶7

Shri R.M.Tahiliyani,Advocate for applicant. Shri Indranil Damle, A.P.P. for State-non-applicant.

¶8

CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 27, 2017

¶9

This is an application for regular bail.

¶10

2] Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned A.P.P. for State.

¶11

3] The applicant is arrested in connection with Crime No.1262/2017, registered with P.S.Ramnagar, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Sections 20 and 22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985.

¶12

4] Mainly, the opposition for grant of bail by prosecution is that investigation is in progress and chargesheet is yet to be filed. However, learned A.P.P. fairly makes a statement on the basis of police papers made available to him that the entire investigation is almost over and only formalities of filing chargesheet is remained to be done.

¶13

5] According to prosecution, the applicant was accosted and apprehended after following the

¶14

¶15

ba.929.17.odt

¶16

mandatory provisions of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985. Of course, said is denied by the applicant. The rival claim will have to be decided at the time of evidence. This, Court is observing in the light of the quantity that was found in possession of the applicant. Admittedly, the applicant was not having found contraband ganja to the extent of commercial quantity. Further, learned A.P.P. submitted to a question put to him by the Court that no other offence is registered against the present applicant and his past is clean. In view of the fact that the seized ganja is not of commercial quantity the applicant can be released on bail by putting certain conditions. Hence, order.

¶17

ORDER

¶18

I) Application is allowed.

¶19

II) Applicant Rameshwar S/o Shriram Gutte be released on bail in Crime No.1262/2017, registered with P.S.Ramnagar, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Sections 20 and 22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985 on he executing P.B. of Rs. 15000/- with two solvent sureties in the like amount .

¶20

III)

¶21

The applicants shall attend P.S.Ramnagar, Chandrapur once in a month i.e. last Friday

¶22

ba.929.17.odt

¶23

¶24

of each month and shall be with the investigating officer from 2.00 p.m. to 5.00 p.m.till the culmination of the trial.

¶25

The application is disposed of.

¶26

JUDGE

¶27

Kitey

Rameshwar S/O. Shriram Gutte (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Ramnagar Dist. Chandrapur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Rameshwar S/O. Shriram Gutte (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Ramnagar Dist. Chandrapur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shushant Narayanrao Gawande and 7 Others Vs Sau. Sonali W/O Subhash Gawande

Salama Parvin W/O. Shaik Akram Vs Sheikh Akram Shaikh Yasin Mansori and Others

Yuvraj S/O Devidas Jadhao (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Washim (Rural) Washim

Pralhad S/O. Gaibu Pawar (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Risod, Dist. Washim

Abdul Matin S/O. Abdul Wahab (in Jail) Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer, Police Station Karanja Dist. Washim

Rohit S/O. Shekhar Yeole and Others (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Police Station Khapa Dist. Nagpur