Single judge dismissed an application for want of prosecution as the applicant and counsel were absent on the specified hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appr69.17.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO.69/2017
Salama Parvin w/o Sk. Akram ..vs.. Sk. Akram Sk. Yasin Mansori & Ors.
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 26, 2017
None for the applicant.
This mater was listed before this Court on 19.09.2017. Even on that day, applicant and his counsel were absent. However, in order to give one chance, the matter was kept for today.
Today when the matter was called out, neither the applicant nor his counsel are present. No request is made on their behalf for adjournment. This shows that the applicant and his counsel are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE
kahale
Salama Parvin w/o Sk. Akram
Sk. Akram Sk. Yasin Mansori & Ors.
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
