Allowed

Rohit S/O. Shekhar Yeole and Others (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Police Station Khapa Dist. Nagpur

Bombay HC27 Sept 2017BA/908/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed the bail application filed by four applicants arrested under various IPC and Arms Act charges. The court granted bail subject to stringent conditions including furnishing bond with sureties, avoiding the trial jurisdiction, and attending police stations weekly.

What did the court decide?

Release of all applicants on bail with PB of Rs. 25,000/- by each plus two solvent sureties; prohibition on entering P.S. Khapa jurisdiction; weekly police station attendance condition.

Rohit S/O. Shekhar Yeole and Others (in Jail) Vs the State of… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

ba.908.17.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 908 OF 2017

¶4

( Rohit S/o Shekhar Yeole and others..vs..The State of Maharashtra, through PSO.PS.Khapa,District-Nagpur)

¶5

_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.

¶6

Shri C.R.Thakur,Advocate for applicants. Shri M.J.Khan, A.P.P. for State-non-applicant.

¶7

CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 27, 2017

¶8

This is an application for regular bail.

¶9

2] Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned A.P.P. for State.

¶10

3] The applicants are arrested on 12/7/2017, in connection with Crime No.151/2017, registered with P.S.Khapa,District-Nagpur for the offence punishable under Sections 143,147,447,427,201,504,506 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Sections 395 and 436 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act.

¶11

4] The F.I.R. is lodged on 12/7/2017 by one Dulichand Baliram Neware, a truck driver. According to complainant when he alongwith his truck was standing in a que at Mouza Wakodi sand ghat in the intervening night of 11/7/2017 five persons came in Scorpio vehicle, alighted and started ransacking fixtures and they also set ablaze huts and also damaged various trucks which were

¶12

¶13

ba.908.17.odt

¶14

standing on the sand ghat. The F.I.R. was lodged against the unidentified persons. The applicants are arrested on 12/7/2017.

¶15

5] The application for bail is mainly opposed by learned A.P.P. on the ground that the investigation is in progress and chargesheet is yet to be filed. However, in his fairness , he stated that from the investigation papers it is crystal clear that the investigation is over and only the act of filing of the chargesheet is remained to be done.

¶16

6] From the reply, it is clear that during the course of investigation test identification parade was conducted. None of the applicant was identified by the complainant. For the reason best known to the investigating officer the other truck owners were not called for identifying the present applicants in test identification parade. Be that as it may, except suspicion there is no other material against the present applicant. According to learned A.P.P. the suspicion against the present applicants is that they are having criminal antecedents at their discredit. The learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicant no.1 is already acquitted from Crime No.21/2012, though other offences are pending. The criminal antecedents will be one of the considerations for deciding the bail application if in the crime in which the applicant is claiming bail is having any prima facie evidence against the present applicants. In the present case, it appears

¶17

ba.908.17.odt

¶18

¶19

that the applicants are arrested only on the suspicion. In that view of the matter, the applicants can be released on bail. However, the interest of the prosecution can also be secured by putting stringent conditions on each of the applicant. Hence, order.

¶20

ORDER

¶21

I) Application is allowed. II) Applicant no.1 Rohit S/o Shekhar Yeole, applicant no.2 Prakash S/o Vinayak Thorat, applicant no.3 Prashant S/o Mukesh Ghodeswar and applicant no.4 Aman S/o Moreshwar Pande be released on bail in Crime No.151/2017, registered with P.S.Khapa,DistrictNagpur for the offence punishable under Sections 143,147,447,427,201,504,506 of the Indian Penal Code ,under Sections 395 and 436 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, on they executing P.B. of Rs. 25,000/- by each of them with two solvent sureties in the like amount by each of them.

¶22

III) The applicants shall not enter into the territorial jurisdiction of P.S.Khapa,District-Nagpur till the culmination of the trial.

¶23

IV) The applicants shall furnish their respective residential addresses at the time of execution of bail bonds to the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class,Saoner as well as to the investigating officer.

¶24

V) The learned Judicial Magistrate First Class,Saoner before whom the bail bonds will be

¶25

4 ba.908.17.odt

¶26

executed after noticing the residential addresses where the applicants are intending to reside shall put a condition that each of the applicant shall attend the nearest police stations of their respective residence once in a week till the culmination of the trial.

¶27

The application is disposed of.

¶28

JUDGE

¶29

Kitey

Rohit S/O. Shekhar Yeole and Others (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Police Station Khapa Dist. Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit S/O. Shekhar Yeole and Others (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Police Station Khapa Dist. Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shushant Narayanrao Gawande and 7 Others Vs Sau. Sonali W/O Subhash Gawande

Salama Parvin W/O. Shaik Akram Vs Sheikh Akram Shaikh Yasin Mansori and Others

Yuvraj S/O Devidas Jadhao (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Washim (Rural) Washim

Rameshwar S/O. Shriram Gutte (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Ramnagar Dist. Chandrapur

Pralhad S/O. Gaibu Pawar (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Risod, Dist. Washim

Abdul Matin S/O. Abdul Wahab (in Jail) Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer, Police Station Karanja Dist. Washim