Petitioner sought premature release considering prison guidelines. Court held the plea infructuous as the petitioner had been released per the State Government's communication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.894/2017(12)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 894 OF 2017
Smt. Vanita Yeshwant Jadhav Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
Mr. D.G. Khamkar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, A.P.P for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED :5TH APRIL, 2017
P.C. :
matter is heard finally.
imprisonment in Yerwada Central Prison, Pune. Hence the prayer is that the State Government to decide her case for premature release
as per the guidelines of the State Government.
WP.894/2017(12)
2
4. The learned APP on the basis of written communication from
the Superintendent of Yerwada Central Prison, Pune states that the Petitioner has completed her period of imprisonment and has been released from Yerwada Central Prison, Pune. The said communication is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
infructuous. Hence, Rule is discharged.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Smt. Vanita Yeshwant Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
