Application for condonation of delay in filing a criminal appeal was disposed of. The court upheld the condonation of delay in the interest of justice.
Delay in filing the appeal has been condoned and the appeal placed for admission on 31.1.2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7. cri appa 29-17.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 14 OF 2017
Sharad S. Gupta
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
| Appearances | |
|---|---|
| Mr. Vinod K. Raman i/by | |
| Mr. Vikram V. Tarepati | Advocate for the Applicant |
| Mr. H.J. Dedia | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 16, 2017.
P.C.:
2. This is an application for condonation of delay caused in
filing the appeal. In view of the averments made in the
application, we are of the opinion that in the interest of
justice, delay ought to be condoned. Accordingly, delay is
condoned.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
7. cri appa 29-17.doc
2 of 2
jfoanz vkacsjdj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the criminal appeal required groundless or non-statutory and if so, should the same be condoned?
Sharad S. Gupta
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
