High Court disposed of Criminal Appeal Crl. A. No. 172 of 2013 as infructuous because, despite the applicant's request for a change of counsel, no bail application was on record.
The Criminal Appeal was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 8.cri.appa.2.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2 OF 2017 IN
CRI. APPEAL NO. 172 OF 2013
Shekhar Vilas Malekar
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mr. Hrishikesh Giri Advocate i/b Mr. Prashant Patil Advocate for Applicant
Mr. H.J. Dedia A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATED : JANUARY 12, 2017
P.C.:
1 The appeal has been filed by Advocate Shri. Prashant Patil. He has been regularly appearing before the Court. In appeal, there is no prayer for bail.
2 In the present application, the applicant has stated that he has engaged advocate Ms. Anjali Patil to file a bail application, however, now he does not want her to continue to
jdk 2 8.cri.appa.2.17.doc
represent him in the bail application and he wants Advocate Ms. Nagma Tandon to file Vakalatnama and to represent him in the bail application. However, it is seen that there is no bail application on record. Thus, this application is infructous and is disposed of as such.
3 Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is in Yerawada Central Prison, Pune.
[ REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]
kandarkar
2 of 2
Shekhar Vilas Malekar
The State of Maharashtra
V. K. Tahilramani
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
