This criminal appeal was disposed of as the appellant, who was the original complainant, filed it against the acquittal of respondent No. 2, who had expired before the report date.
The appeal abates and is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1a. cri apeal 276-15.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 276 OF 2015
Anand Yellappa Walawalkar
.. Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
.. Respondents
| Appearances | |
|---|---|
| Ms. Naima Shaikh i/by | |
| Mr. Khan Abdul Wabah | Advocate for the Appellant |
| Mr. H.J. Dedia | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 16, 2017.
P.C.:
appeal against acquittal of respondent No. 2 - Rajendrakumar @ Annamalai Nadar. The report dated 14.3.2016 of Senior P.I. of Dharavi Police Station, Mumbai
shows that respondent No. 2 has expired. The said report is
taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. In this
view of the matter, this appeal abates and is disposed of as
such.
[ REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 1
Anand Yellappa Walawalkar
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
V.K. Tahilramani
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
