Allowed
Sanjay Namdeo Gandhile v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPA/206/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 8.crappa.206.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 206 OF 2017 IN
APPEAL ST. NO. 122 OF 2017
Sanjay Namdeo Gandhile
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mr. Swapnil Ovalekar Advocate for Applicant Mr. H.J.Dedia A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 16, 2017
P.C.:
1 By judgment and order dated 29/30th August, 2016
the applicant has been convicted and sentenced under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC. Being aggrieved thereby, the applicant has preferred Criminal Appeal St. No. 122 of 2017. As there is delay in preferring the appeal, this application has been preferred for condonation of delay caused in filing the appeal.
1 of 2
kandarkar
jdk 2 8.crappa.206.17.doc
2 Looking to the fact that this appeal is filed through jail and in view of the averments made in the application, we are of the opinion that in the interest of justice, delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, delay is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of in above terms.
[ REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. ] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]
2 of 2
Sanjay Namdeo Gandhile
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
RevatI Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court