Parvez Akhtar Tajamul Hussain Siddique v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for bail modification where applicant remained in jail due to inability to produce sureties. Court denied cash bail in MCOC Act case but reduced bail money.
What did the court decide?
Bail is reduced to Rs.15,000 with one or two sureties. Previous order modified accordingly.
What the court decided
jdk 1 3.cr.appa.173.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 173 OF 2017 IN CRI. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1310 OF 2015 IN
CRI. APPEAL NO. 906 OF 2015
Parvez Akhtar Tajamul Hussain Siddique .. Applicant / Ori.Appellant
Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through DCB CDI CR No.11/2009 in D.N.Nagar Police Station Cr.No.374/2008
.. Respondent
Ms. Beerta H. Bajwa i/b Lalla and Lalla Advocate for the Applicant Mrs. G.P.Mulekar A.P.P. for State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 06, 2017
ORAL ORDER : [PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
- 1 Heard both sides.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant could be released on cash bail in lieu of sureties given the nature of the MCOC Act case.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Parvez Akhtar Tajamul Hussain Siddique
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra Through DCB CDI
Coram
V.K.Tahilramani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court