This judgment condones a delay of 92 days in filing a criminal appeal against conviction and sentence. The court, considering the averments made, held that the delay deserves condonation and allowed the application in the interest of justice.
Delay is condoned; application for condonation of delay is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-appa.96.2017.doc
1/2
-nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.96 OF 2017 (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.60 OF 2017 (THROUGH JAIL)
Pegya @ Rama Sayabu Shinde ...Applicant/Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Ms. Rohini M. Dandekar, Advocate appointed for the Applicant.
Mr. H. J. Dedia, A.P.P for the Respondent-State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : 3rd FEBRUARY, 2017
P.C. :
in filing the appeal against conviction and sentence. The delay is of 92 days.
904-appa.96.2017.doc
2/2
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay for 92 days in filing a criminal appeal against conviction and sentence is warranted.
Whether the interest of justice warrants allowance of the application for condonation of delay.
Pegya @ Rama Sayabu Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahtahilramani
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
