Anticipatory bail application rejected under section 438 CrPC for apprehended arrest in offences of assault with iron rod involving grievous hurt, citing prima facie evidence from injured statements and injury certificates.
Application for pre-arrest bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
aba.277.2017_909.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.277 OF 2017
Mahesh Popatrao Godse
... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.M.S. Mane, for the Applicant Mr.Prashant Jadhav, APP, for Respondent – State Mr.D.A.Waidhande, Police Havaldar, Satara police station – present
CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2017
P.C. :
1 / 3
aba.277.2017_909.doc
2 / 3
aba.277.2017_909.doc
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
3 / 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted under section 438 CrPC in an anticipatory bail application.
Whether the gravamen of offences punishable under sections 326, 307 and 34 IPC warrants denial of bail.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Mahesh Popatrao Godse
The State of Maharashtra
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
