Bigv Telecom Pvt. Ltd., v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
A single-line order dismissing a criminal application due to the absence of the applicant's counsel. Court adjourned no hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 1 25-APPLN-102-2016.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.102 OF 2016
BIGV TELECOM PVT. LTD. .... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
None present for the Applicant. Mr. Y.M. Nakhawa, APP for State.
CORAM : MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 16th FEBRUARY, 2017.
P.C. :
None present for the applicant. Hence dismissed.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
Nesarikar
Bigv Telecom Pvt. Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
Anr.
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court