Writ petition disposed of due to the election process being in motion. Petitioner retained an option to avail other legal remedies later.
Petition disposed without prejudice to petitioner's right to avail other remedies later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp926916.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9269 OF 2016
Shakuntala w/o Namdev Shejul
Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.K.J.Suryawanshi, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.K.SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 31st August, 2016
PER COURT:
Since the process of election is set in motion, no interference is called for at the intermediate stage. Keeping an option open to the petitioner to avail of the remedies available in law, writ petition stands disposed of.
K.K.SONAWANE JUDGE
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
adb/wp926916
Shakuntala w/o Namdev Shejul
State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
