In a contempt petition regarding non-compliance with a direction to process pension papers, the court found substantial compliance and disposed of the matter.
Contempt petition disposed of upon finding substantial compliance with the prior order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CP-116.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 116 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6818 OF 2016
Abdul Wajid Khan s/o Mahboob Khan ...PETITIONER
versus
Shri. Ghalib Hundekari Principal Kamala Nehru Polytechnic (Pharmacy) Aurangabad and ors.
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. U.T. Pathan, Advocate holding for Mr. Y. M.Khan , Advocate for petitioner Mr. N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr. P.S. Patil, AGP for respondents -State
CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 30th AUGUST, 2016.
Order :-
2 CP-116.16
that ' No objection certificate ' is required to be furnished by respondent – Institution and the Principal.
Sd/Sd/-
[K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]
MTK
Abdul Wajid Khan
Shri. Ghalib Hundekari
K. K. Sonawane
R. M. Borde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
