In these multiple writ petitions challenging transfer orders, the Court disposed of the same as the grievance was accepted by the Divisional Commissioner leading to modification of the transfer orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp811416.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
(1) WRIT PETITION NO.8114 OF 2016
Sau. Premla Lingoji Gajulwad
Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.R.R.Mantri, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sujeet Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.3,
WITH
Chandrashekhar s/o Dattatraya Jadhav Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another Respondents
Mr.S.B.Sontakke, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2,
WITH
Anita d/o Ramchandra Jadhav Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others Respondents
Mr.V.S.Panpatte, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sujeet Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondents No.3 & 4.
WITH
wp811416.odt
{2}
(4)WRIT PETITION NO.7356 OF 2016
Jyotsana d/o Kishan Waghmare
Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.V.S.Panpatte, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sujeet Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondents No. 2 & 3
WITH
Ekbal d/o Umdusaheb Shaikh Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another
Respondents
Mr.S.P.Kausalye, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2.
WITH
Surekha d/o Bapurao Mutte Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another
Respondents
Mr.S.P.Kausalye, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2,
WITH
{3} wp811416.odt
Ramesh s/o Kishanrao Mendke Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.V.S.Panpatte, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2 & 3,
WITH
Meenakshi d/o Mohanrao Bondle Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another
Respondents
Mr.V.A.Dhakne, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sujeet Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2
WITH
Uttam s/o Vivshwanath Devkate
Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another
Respondents
Mr.S.P.Kausalye, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sujeet Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2
WITH
(10) WRIT PETITION NO.6090 OF 2016
Sanjay Motiram Sawale Petitioner
wp811416.odt
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another
Respondents
Mr.A.A.Nimbalkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondents No.2 to 4.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.K.SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 31st August, 2016
PER COURT:
Learned Counsel appearing for Zilla Parishad, on instructions, states that the grievance raised by respective petitioners in aforesaid writ petitions has been accepted by the learned Divisional Commissioner and as such, the transfer orders are modified accordingly.
In this view of the matter, petitions need not be considered on merit. Writ Petitions are disposed of. If, at all, any grievance survives, it would be open for the concerned petitioner to avail of the remedies available in law.
K.K.SONAWANE JUDGE
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
adb/wp811416
Sau. Premla Lingoji Gajulwad
Chandrashekhar s/o Dattatraya Jadhav
Anita d/o Ramchandra Jadhav
Jyotsana d/o Kishan Waghmare
Ekbal d/o Umdusaheb Shaikh
Surekha d/o Bapurao Mutte
R.M.Borde
K.K.Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
