The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed criminal writ petitions as withdrawn by the petitioners, granting leave and liberty to file for discharge.
Leave granted to withdraw; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file for discharge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cwp859.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.859 OF 2015
1) Gajanan s/o Ramchandra Kadam,
2) Sudhakar s/o Ramchandra Kadam,
3) Ramchandra s/o Vithalrao Kadam,
4) Keshav s/o Nagorao Wankhede
...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
1) The State of Maharashtra,
2) Datta s/o Manikrao Bhadekar
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mrs. Charuta Sunil Deshmukh Advocate for the
Petitioners.
Mr.S.Y. Mahajan Addl. P.P. for Resp. No.1.
Mr. G.P. Shinde Advocate for Respondent No.2.
...
ORDER :
1.The learned counsel appearing for the
cwp859.15
2
petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to
withdraw this Petition, with liberty to take out
the appropriate remedy by way of filing
application for discharge in the event of filing
of charge-sheet by the Investigating Officer.
2.Leave granted. The Writ Petition stands
dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed
for.
[K.K. SONAWANE, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
asb/DEC16
Gajanan s/o Ramchandra Kadam
Sudhakar s/o Ramchandra Kadam
Ramchandra s/o Vithalrao Kadam
Keshav s/o Nagorao Wankhede
The State of Maharashtra
Datta s/o Manikrao Bhadekar
K.K. Sonawane
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court